> so I'd say doing a good job is significantly harder Maybe, but this highlights another problem in "soft" careers (social, marketing, teaching etc). It's very

> so I'd say doing a good job is significantly harder Maybe, but this highlights another problem in "soft" careers (social, marketing, teaching etc). It's very hard to objectively qualify candidates. In programming, it's easy: you can program, or not. If you can, the question is likely how fast can you learn new things, and how complex programs you can design & write. Good lawyers win cases. Good traders make money. And so on... How do you compare teachers, marketers (except bullshit "increased engagement by 1600%" claims on their CVs), etc?