"... and you're now impying that I should use [Y]..." You perceive someone is "implying that [you] should use" [Y]. It is as if you believe the mere publicati

"... and you're now impying that I should use [Y]..." You perceive someone is "implying that [you] should use" [Y]. It is as if you believe the mere publication of software is somehow didactic. As if the author by the mere act of writing and sharing a program is telling you what to do. If the question in 1. were phrased as something like "How does Y compare with X" then that is not what I am addressing. I am addressing this idea that someone (who?) is "implying" that you should use Y. What if that was not actually the case and it was just your interpretation? What if the authors are not telling you what software to use. What if it was simply a case of a person or group writing some software, e.g., maybe to scratch their own itch, and then publishing it in case others may want to use it. Keep in mind I am now referring to the general case, e.g., each program source published on Github, not Vita. It would be interesting if users, without any financial contribution, could tell software authors what programs to write or refrain from writing, but that is not what I see when I look at the large amount of software published on the internet. If the authors of Vita were getting paid to write it, then I doubt they would view it as "wasted effort".