3 ms·
> I'm 100% OK with having to sign-in for every tab as well I think this is the reason why people haven't done it. Most users don't want that, because it means
by untog 8y ago
> I'm 100% OK with having to sign-in for every tab as well
I think this is the reason why people haven't done it. Most users don't want that, because it means that if you open any link in a new tab in any kind of signed in environment it'll fail. In an ideal world opening a link and opening in a new tab are functionally equivalent except for the "new tab" part.
A middle ground I'd like is for the Firefox containers function to allow you to automatically create a container for each domain you visit. That way, all the tabs I have for my logged in site will be logged in, but won't share state with anything else.
- icebraining 8y agoNow I'm thinking that integrating Tree Style Tab with containers could be a good way to control them; each root tab would be its own container, and children would automatically open in it.
- bostonvaulter2 8y agoIt would be interesting to have non-tab nodes in the Tree Style Tab tree. Some of the them could be persistent and some of them could be temporary (e.g. for a new rabbit hole you're mapping)