Is anybody else here still really confused by USB-IF's decisions recently? From what I can tell: Formerly-USB_3.0 was "USB_3.1 Gen1" is now USB 3.1 Formerly-

Is anybody else here still really confused by USB-IF's decisions recently? From what I can tell: Formerly-USB_3.0 was "USB_3.1 Gen1" is now USB 3.1 Formerly-USB_3.1 was "USB_3.1 Gen2" is now USB 3.2 Gen2 The new thing, which is essentially a double-width now-USB-3.2 Gen2 bus, is USB Gen2x2" Mix this with a new connector, and we now have: USB-type-C, but it's actually USB-2.0 in a Type-C connector USB-type-C Thunderbolt, which is USB-type-C plus Thunderbolt, which can then carry DisplayPort. USB-type-C: and probably a million different implementations of power over USB-type-C. Dear Intel, please keep the Thunderbolt name and numbering scheme! Thunderbolt (1) (Mini-DisplayPort connector) Thunderbolt 2 (Mini-DisplayPort connector) Thunderbolt 3 (uses USB-Type C) Theirs is so much better. Edited more than once for formatting.