2 ms·
I never thought I'd say it but Google paying up to $4 or 5b for Twitter kind of makes sense. Google badly wants a "social media" win. Twitter, for better or f
by aresant 16y ago
I never thought I'd say it but Google paying up to $4 or 5b for Twitter kind of makes sense.
Google badly wants a "social media" win.
Twitter, for better or for worse, is the cheapest household brand name of social media.
I've personally found much value from searching archived Tweets via twitter & google which suggests that Google could monetize that asset, as they've done with YouTube, and turn this into a huge win since selling ads is such a core competency.
On the other hand, Google's biggest aquisition win - YouTube - they got for a relative "steal" at ~$1.65b in an ALL stock transaction, which you know isn't going to happen with Twitter.
http://mashable.com/2010/07/09/google-social-media-attempts/ http://mashable.com/2010/07/09/google-social-media-attempts/ - Google's history of social media attempts
- lawfulfalafel 16y agoI think twitter would fit with google because they can leap any privacy concerns. After the buzz fiasco and the reaction to the facebook privacy changes a public social network like twitter might be more valuable than it seems.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]