2 ms·
> defrauds the customer without the customer suffering harm How does that work? I don't think this position is defensible, and I also don't think this is what'
by rhn_mk1 8y ago
> defrauds the customer without the customer suffering harm
How does that work? I don't think this position is defensible, and I also don't think this is what's happening: the customer is defrauded by bearing a risk they did not choose.
- thaumasiotes 8y agoIt's stipulated that the risk cannot hurt them. The risk you describe is that they don't know whether they're getting what they want or not. But if they're not, that is the first category, product not as described.
- rhn_mk1 8y agoIn that light, I cannot see how it's different than "not as described". If there is no damage (no one can be hurt), then this does not deserve to be called fraud. Any mitigation would also be wrong on the grounds of wasting time and resources for zero benefit.