>The way you wrote and posted this article, there was an implication to me (and I'm guessing to others) that you think this design philosophy is better than wha

>The way you wrote and posted this article, there was an implication to me (and I'm guessing to others) that you think this design philosophy is better than what most other people are doing. The article would benefit from some qualifications, e.g.: "I'm still teaching myself UX and aesthetic design," for example. As it is, it comes across as a strong argument from someone who thinks he's an expert (and thinks other people's design decisions are wrong). I thought I covered this pretty well in the conclusion: "I’m not a particularly skilled UI designer, so keeping it simple like this also helps to make a reasonably nice UI attainable for an engineer-oriented developer like me." Outside of that, thank you very much for the resources.