I did not mean to reply to a different comment. I did address the parent's point by explaining that the premise of the point (the claim that no piece of C/C++ c

I did not mean to reply to a different comment. I did address the parent's point by explaining that the premise of the point (the claim that no piece of C/C++ code is ever safe) should be categorically rejected and not engaged with. > "Replying to everybody who replied to your comment is pointless if you don't take the time to read and process the replies." This feels like you are being needlessly antagonistic and assuming incorrectly that I failed to read other comments or replies. If you did not understand the manner in which my comment was responding to the parent, that's fine, but it was and I don't appreciate your tone.