4 ms·
With the altitude change I wouldn't expect 200 miles of range to be sufficient for SF->Tahoe, reverse might work.
by dogsgobork 8y ago
With the altitude change I wouldn't expect 200 miles of range to be sufficient for SF->Tahoe, reverse might work.
- sliken 8y ago0.9*325 = 292.5 miles. A friend tracked his battery use on a trip from SF -> Tahoe, the climb took around 30 miles of range, which I thought was pretty reasonable. He climbs two 7200 feet passes, and was driving quite quickly.