3 ms·
I think you're kind of missing the point of my comment. The article's point is that they lost $11 million in songs. My point was that it appears they could hav
by strictnein 8y ago
I think you're kind of missing the point of my comment.
The article's point is that they lost $11 million in songs. My point was that it appears they could have retained that music for probably a small fee, with that CD being sent to someone outside of prison, or maybe sent to them after they left prison (the details aren't in the article, unfortunately).
I'm annoyed that the article glossed over this.
- stordoff 8y agoPresumably they want them in prison though, so it doesn't really address that part of the problem.
- crooked-v 8y agoThat still leaves the prisoners having to purchase music again if they want to listen to it in prison, despite that being the only reason for the original transaction in the first place.