4 ms·
I think the discrepancy lies between "this scene never happened" and "this scene was never witnessed by the human eye as such". I think one of the expectations
by craigsmansion 8y ago
I think the discrepancy lies between "this scene never happened" and "this scene was never witnessed by the human eye as such".
I think one of the expectations of a photograph can be to be a reproduction of a scene as it was witnessed, not as it happened. That is, as the photographer was shooting the volcano, he never beheld the Milky way and the sea of light from the valleys that way, that only appeared in post-production.
I don't necessarily think it's fake to prettify an image [1], but I can imagine why some people would consider it less than real.
1. "Pillars of Creation" looks awe inspiring in spite of: "The blue colors in the image represent oxygen, red is sulfur, and green represents both nitrogen and hydrogen."
- stordoff 8y agoI'd split into documentary-reproducing what you could witness and artistic-using photographic techniques to create a pleasing result. It's also not really post-processing - it's a choice you make at capture time. Do I leave the shutter open for (say) 1/30s to document what I'm seeing, or 5s to capture the light trails?