5 ms·
Isn't PPX supposed to replace Camlp4?
by StreamBright 8y ago
Isn't PPX supposed to replace Camlp4?
- Tommah 8y agoI think so. See https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/is-camlp4-being-deprecated-in-favor-of-ppx/979/ https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/is-camlp4-being-deprecated-in-fa... I recently came back to OCaml (and js_of_ocaml) after being away for a few years. In the time I was gone, js_of_ocaml moved from camlp4 to ppx. (edited to fix link)
- nraynaud 8y agoIt doesn't change the issue that when people have changed the grammar, you have to find their documentation to read their code, if the library is not used you have to read the parse tree transformation code, etc.
- StreamBright 8y agoI see, your problem is the new grammar. I have never used OCaml with these features so I wasn't aware of this. Good to know.