3 ms·
No, that does not become the question. They chose money over morals, that's it. It's not like they are helpless victims to economic principles, so they have no
by Joe-Z 8y ago
No, that does not become the question. They chose money over morals, that's it.
It's not like they are helpless victims to economic principles, so they have no other choice than to work for the scummiest types of companies because they offer good pay.
- samatman 8y agoSure, you can stop there, if your interest is in moral judgement. If you’re more interested in shifting the landscape, changing the incentives becomes the priority. Only one of these puts a stop to the objectionable behavior and wasted talent. So I know which I prefer.
- cousin_it 8y ago> If you’re more interested in shifting the landscape, changing the incentives becomes the priority. Or changing laws to make the bad stuff illegal. I'd be happy to make most ads illegal. In some places they banned all roadside billboards and you know what happened? It made the view better and didn't hurt the economy.
- samatman 8y agoThat's certainly one way to change the incentives, and it's one I happen to be open to.
- sgt101 8y agoThe strange thing is the addiction, people make several million dollars, and then keep going.... Doing bad things for no real motivation (if you v concede that fear of poverty is a fair driver)