3 ms·
Two parts that seem incorrect: 1) YC has one company with very high potential of a billion dollar exit in Dropbox. An IPO in a few years isn't out of the quest
by staunch 16y ago
Two parts that seem incorrect:
1) YC has one company with very high potential of a billion dollar exit in Dropbox. An IPO in a few years isn't out of the question either. They also have at least a half dozen that are likely to be as big or bigger than Viaweb:
2) Google took seed funding early and then raised VC. That is the model YC uses.
- atirip 16y agoDropbox is AFAIK a one founder company. Go figure.
- chegra 16y ago"It was founded in 2007 by MIT graduates Drew Houston and Arash Ferdowsi as a Y Combinator startup" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dropbox_%28service%29 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dropbox_%28service%29
- atirip 16y agoThis therad disagrees: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=801503 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=801503
- StavrosK 16y agoDrew applied as a single founder but one of the conditions for his acceptance was that he recruits a cofounder, if I recall correctly.
- ddd8 16y agoWhile I admire what Drew has done, a billion-dollar valuation is completely off. Assuming Dropbox has 30% margins, with 5 million users, and a 1% conversion rate (say it nets $5 per customer), their earnings would be around the $3 million mark. Assuming a 5-10x multiple, I'd say the current valuation of Dropbox is in the $15-$30 million range.
- JabavuAdams 16y ago> YC has one company with very high potential of a billion dollar exit in Dropbox. How is this possible? I'm not trolling -- I genuinely don't understand this.
- chesser 16y ago2) I'm not criticizing the idea of funding, I'm saying the amount is small. Google got either $100k total or $100k each from David Cheriton and Andy Bechtolsheim, depending on which article you read. Presumably they had their living arrangements already covered, so it could all go to the company and not to rent. Even though computing resources are cheaper now, the bar is much higher, so if your project needs a cluster or significant bandwidth it's still expensive in relative terms. 1) A lot of things have the "potential" to work out, but you can only count the ones that actually do. Besides, even a billion-dollar exit isn't "The Next Google". By Paul's own binary metric, that's still a failure. Let's say they owned 6% but that got diluted to 1/4th from follow-on rounds; their cut would be 15 million before taxes. They (Y Combinator) took $2 million in 2009 and then $8.25 million in 2010 from investors including Sequoia, so it's either going to be divvied up a dozen ways or has to pay back the $10.25 million first or whatever the terms are. Or maybe that's only for 2009 and 2010 startups, so it only has to be split between the 4 partners they had at the time (of funding Dropbox). It's a win for the founder, but there are other wins that this model can miss. David Heinemeier Hansson at Startup School 08: http://www.justin.tv/hackertv/b/259414909 http://www.justin.tv/hackertv/b/259414909 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CDXJ6bMkMY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CDXJ6bMkMY