3 ms·
Maybe you should just think of it as the NoSQL version of sqlite3 but with added version control.
by po 16y ago
Maybe you should just think of it as the NoSQL version of sqlite3 but with added version control.
- jemfinch 16y agoWhat does that even mean?
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- JoachimSchipper 16y agoI think "easy to set up" combined with "less crappy than expected". Although SQLite isn't very crappy at all...
- chopsueyar 16y agoBecause sqlite stores everything in a flatfile, so your are just doing version control on flatfile changes.
- po 16y agoSqlite is often used as a quick and dirty database by projects that don't want to burden their developers with the setup overhead of mysql or postgres. It's a tiny, rock-solid executable that stores data in a single binary file and supports sql access. Access to the file is globally locked. It's good enough for testing out a project on a single developer's machine but the global lock makes it hard to use in a multi-user production scenario. In a similar vein I could see git as a widely available, rock-solid, "quick and dirty" way for a project to store and retrieve documents.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]