3 ms·
UI !== UX, without the research side it is kinda pointless. I'm not sure if the point of the article was to say that but it's what I read
by werber 8y ago
UI !== UX, without the research side it is kinda pointless. I'm not sure if the point of the article was to say that but it's what I read
- Theodores 8y agoThank goodness someone has chimed in with this. The original article has no mention of UX. UI developers are getting marched out the door at a well known publisher right now, their services no longer needed. UX is a different story with this mystery publisher, they now get to call a lot of the shots. There is a bigger discussion to be had regarding the whole visual design process. In 2006 when you could have your navigation in any corner of the screen with any design for the search icon it made sense to have UI designers add their special flourishes. Now we know where the navigation goes and what the icon is for search, that has all been settled. User experience still needs some people to take care of it as we can't leave that up to the programmers, can we?