4 ms·
But is that true? Did they remove all videos based on false premises? And how did they decide the premise was false?
by chrismcb 8y ago
But is that true? Did they remove all videos based on false premises? And how did they decide the premise was false?
- melling 8y agoThe one movie looks like it was 4.5 stars out of 5, with 3900 people rating it. It has more reviews than the Matrix.
- lugg 8y agoSex sells. This is why the whole popular vote thing doesn't really work for stuff like this. Humans are way too easily biased.
- throwawaymath 8y agoThey need not decide the premise is false; they can rely on scientific consensus. It's not a perfect heuristic but it's the most useful one we have. If they're transparent about the sources they use and they're impartial and consistent in their application (read: no videos given special treatment), they're not arbitrating. They're (actively) reporting.
- pbreit 8y agoArguable that sugar is more harmful than a video.
- throwawaymath 8y agoIt sure is! Tell you what, I'm all on board for a massive awareness campaign by Google, Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Netflix on the dangers of sugar intake as well.
- lugg 8y agoThat's like the tobacco industry advertising the dangers of skin cancer. Sure, good, I guess, but I'm left very confused.