I think your opinion is basically the standard one: censorship is generally bad, marketplace of ideas, etc. I don't have a take on this particular issue. But I

I think your opinion is basically the standard one: censorship is generally bad, marketplace of ideas, etc. I don't have a take on this particular issue. But I think censorship is generally very dangerous, and I also think the Mill-style marketplace of ideas is a bad analogy bordering on the nonsensical the more I think about it. Humans generally synchronize their ideas with each other and generally put minimal effort into validating their ideas because the synchronization process works enough as a heuristic. The obvious attack then is to blast out intentionally harmful material in order to do things like cause disease outbreaks. Our position can't just be that were defenseless against this kind of attack because censorship is more evil than disease outbreaks. There must be some nuance that so far nobody has articulated sufficiently well. And none of this really even matters because Amazon is a private platform where I can almost never find the thing I want to watch. The amount of things not on Prime Video is so vast that it's hard to get up in arms about them removing something that has no obvious value other than to cause harm.