4 ms·
Three observations: 1. These problems caused actual confusion for real developers doing ordinary web development work. One of the linked questions has hundreds
by XCabbage 8y ago
Three observations:
1. These problems caused actual confusion for real developers doing ordinary web development work. One of the linked questions has hundreds of thousands of views.
2. You suggest I'm being a pedantic dick to people who are "helping others", but W3Schools doesn't help anyone - at least compared to the counterfactual of them not existing. It would hypothetically be right to say "okay, they have errors, but they're better than nothing" if the realistic alternative was "nothing". But the realistic alternative is that MDN would rise to the top of search results. The complaints about W3Schools' accuracy come in the context of them having skillfully SEOed their content above basically everything else, including huge amounts of not-for-profit content that is vastly superior to theirs. That does cause their very existence to do damage to the world, and make them worthy targets of criticism.
3. Remedying the point about the behaviour of colspan in real browsers being misdocumented doesn't require W3Schools to "write a novel" about anything. It just requires to them to remove content they've included which is false.
- johnmarcus 8y agolol. the reason they ranked at the top is because it was useful. i rarely found the information on there incorrect. certainly much rarer to be incorrect than stack overflow, and the coverage of a topic was much more thorough and not constrained to only questions that have been asked. if you didn't like the content, you could simply not go to it. your just a horse complaining about the hand that fed you.