I initially misread your comment and thought you were arguing something entirely different. If what you’re saying is that simply removing humans from the equat

I initially misread your comment and thought you were arguing something entirely different. If what you’re saying is that simply removing humans from the equation wouldn’t change atmospheric CO2 for a long time, I think we’re actually in agreement there. It supports my point that population control isn’t how we’re going to get on a different trajectory in the decade or so we have. But I don’t think it addresses the ideas of effective carbon capture. Soil carbon capture, for one, is incredibly promising. Reforestation is another.