6 ms·

US wage is growing though. Money is flowing into US at an unprecedented rate due to: a.) Fed raising interest rates to a normal level. Government bonds are now

US wage is growing though. Money is flowing into US at an unprecedented rate due to: a.) Fed raising interest rates to a normal level. Government bonds are now earning close to some of the faster developing countries, without the risks. b.) Brexit impacting the growth of EU. Germany narrowly avoids recession....for now. But grew only 1.5% in 2018. There's still the matter of a possible US tariff on EU automobiles. And Italy/Greece/Spain debts are still a thing. c.) Chinese economy is crumbling. GM dropped crashed 15% in China in 2018. Ford dropped 36%. iPhone sales dropped 13%. Louis Vuitton dropped 20%. Overall car sales dropped 13%. Stock market dropped 22%. Real estate sales in January 2019 dropped 44%. d.) Asian countries impacted by China's fall. South Korea's export to China dropped 14% in 2018. Japan dropped 8%. Taiwan dropped 10%. Singapore dropped 8%. e.) Uncertainties and high debt ratio in developing countries, prompting money to seek safe harbor. Tariff and protectionism impacts. f.) lastly, US is growing at a healthy 3% in 2018

pas 8y ago
How does the Fed interest raise helps with more money flowing into the US? I mean okay, money flows into US "saving accounts", but due to higher interest rate a lot of investments will be put on hold, no? The Fed raised the target federal funds rate, which is the rate of the interbank overnight repo market, which is basically the "back office" clearing house between the accounts of creditors and debtors. And all of this means that the NY Fed's trading desk does a lot of open market transactions to reach that goal. (It converts cash in banks' reserve accounts into US Treasury bonds, thus forcing banks to increase their reserves - to meet requirements, hence forcing banks to loan reserves from other banks, which pushes up the overnight repo rate.) How does this effect the US Treasury bond auction rate? (In theory banks [and other primary dealers that participate in the auction] just use loans (excess reserve) to buy bonds, so if excess reserve is less, then fewer banks are able/willing to buy bonds, so yes, that pushes up rates, but the target-FFR increase only affected US banks, and US T-bills are bought by a lot of foreign entities.)
- appsonify 8y ago
  all I know is they raise interest rates, it absorbs up the money supply in circulation due to the attractive yields on the Ts also the whole trope about 'China owning most of US T-bills' is actually false, there is apparently T-bills that are specifically sold to foreign nations, and then there are the real T-bills that not many countries own. The other one is an IOU and may not be honored, say during wartime.
  - deleted 8y ago
    [deleted]
  - sbov 8y ago
    This seems to break down who owns what: https://www.thebalance.com/who-owns-the-u-s-national-debt-3306124 https://www.thebalance.com/who-owns-the-u-s-national-debt-33... The single largest holder of government debt is the Social Security Trust Fund.
  - pas 8y ago
    They raise the rates indirectly, by selling T-bills on the secondary market, which simply sucks money out of the circulation. (Which makes simply makes debt more expensive, and that leads to T-rate increase.) > also the whole trope about 'China owning most of US T-bills' is actually false, They are just the largest foreign holder, and it was noteworthy because of the rapid rise in the distribution of foreign debt holders. Anyway, my thought process was that even if the US money supply drops, it should not influence T-bill auctions, because the whole world likes it (due to being the least risky investment). But it's very likely that the T-rate was low because banks and other investors exploited the low FFR. Now that's gone, the system settled in a higher equilibrium (as foreign and other investors had no real reason to change their behavior).
- NTDF9 8y ago
  I'm not an economist but here's how I see it. Money flows into US treasury bonds, directly. People and corporations literally have direct accounts with the treasury. The US has large fiscal deficits and needs to borrow dollars. The FED set a good interest rate. It's causing owners of dollars to lend money to US Govt in hopes of safe interest gains. This large deficit happened because of large tax cuts in the first place. Which means, citizens have more dollars in their hands (at the expense of future interest payments). This is driving up spending and thus investment to satisfy that spending. The yield curve is flattening because of this as more and more people think that long term, the interest payments on today's spending will weigh on economy. Thus, it will ultimately cause FED to lower interest rates. Get in on risk free money while you can. All of the above is domestic US. Internationally, the dollars that could've helped other countries came back to US in the form of lending. So those countries don't have dollars to invest, causing drops in asset prices and deflation and debt overhang.
  - WillPostForFood 8y ago
    * This large deficit happened because of large tax cuts in the first place.* Tax cuts can't directly cause deficits, only spending can. Spending money you don't have offsetting revenue for causes the deficit. Cutting taxes without cutting spending is a problem. Tax revenue is not down, even with the tax cuts, but spending is growing much more quickly.
    - NTDF9 8y ago
      >> Tax cuts can't directly cause deficits, only spending can. Spending money you don't have offsetting revenue for causes the deficit. Cutting taxes without cutting spending is a problem. Tax revenue is not down, even with the tax cuts, but spending is growing much more quickly. That's a political debate. Economically, an entity needs to have equal inflow and outflow of money to be balanced. The govt needs enough revenue to offset its expenses (a lot of which is interest on debt taken years before, military and entitlements.) If you think about it, generations before partied hard on the credit card with low taxes && still getting social security, medicare etc. Today's generation gets to pick either low taxes or social security/medicare. Tomorrow's generation might not even have the choice.
jazzyjackson 8y ago
I feel like the stats of how American companies are selling in China is not an indicator of the growth of the Chinese economy, of course the market and real estate indicators are still valid.
- witcherchaos 8y ago
  Louis Vuitton is a French company. Also, Burberry, am English company, had 8% drop in sales
  - monocasa 8y ago
    Better said: it's not clear that foreign company crashes in China are a sign that the Chinese economy is "crumbling". One of the largest pieces of their current economic plan is "Made in China 2025": a shift from being a contract manufacturing base to instead be building and manufacturing Chinese designed and branded goods. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Made_in_China_2025 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Made_in_China_2025
    - witcherchaos 8y ago
      Incorrect 1.) made in 2025 was announced in 2015. Crash happened last year in a sudden fashion across all luxury goods 2.) brand loyalty doesn’t work like an immediate switch easily levered by a government. 3.) average Chinese citizens prefer foreign brands still, due to food and vaccine poisoning cases from local firms
      - coldtea 8y ago
        Incorrect >1.) made in 2025 was announced in 2015. Crash happened last year in a sudden fashion across all luxury goods Which is neither here nor there. Something can be announced in 2015 and be put in effect "last year", or have some significant component on it put in effect last year, or see the first major results of the overall thing a few years later. >2.) brand loyalty doesn’t work like an immediate switch easily levered by a government. Extra tariffs and support for local made products ("buy patriotic"), however does. >3.) average Chinese citizens prefer foreign brands still, due to food and vaccine poisoning cases from local firms Which is irrelevant to things that are not foods.

pas 8y ago

How does the Fed interest raise helps with more money flowing into the US? I mean okay, money flows into US "saving accounts", but due to higher interest rate a lot of investments will be put on hold, no? The Fed raised the target federal funds rate, which is the rate of the interbank overnight repo market, which is basically the "back office" clearing house between the accounts of creditors and debtors. And all of this means that the NY Fed's trading desk does a lot of open market transactions to reach that goal. (It converts cash in banks' reserve accounts into US Treasury bonds, thus forcing banks to increase their reserves - to meet requirements, hence forcing banks to loan reserves from other banks, which pushes up the overnight repo rate.) How does this effect the US Treasury bond auction rate? (In theory banks [and other primary dealers that participate in the auction] just use loans (excess reserve) to buy bonds, so if excess reserve is less, then fewer banks are able/willing to buy bonds, so yes, that pushes up rates, but the target-FFR increase only affected US banks, and US T-bills are bought by a lot of foreign entities.)

appsonify 8y ago
all I know is they raise interest rates, it absorbs up the money supply in circulation due to the attractive yields on the Ts also the whole trope about 'China owning most of US T-bills' is actually false, there is apparently T-bills that are specifically sold to foreign nations, and then there are the real T-bills that not many countries own. The other one is an IOU and may not be honored, say during wartime.
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
- sbov 8y ago
  This seems to break down who owns what: https://www.thebalance.com/who-owns-the-u-s-national-debt-3306124 https://www.thebalance.com/who-owns-the-u-s-national-debt-33... The single largest holder of government debt is the Social Security Trust Fund.
- pas 8y ago
  They raise the rates indirectly, by selling T-bills on the secondary market, which simply sucks money out of the circulation. (Which makes simply makes debt more expensive, and that leads to T-rate increase.) > also the whole trope about 'China owning most of US T-bills' is actually false, They are just the largest foreign holder, and it was noteworthy because of the rapid rise in the distribution of foreign debt holders. Anyway, my thought process was that even if the US money supply drops, it should not influence T-bill auctions, because the whole world likes it (due to being the least risky investment). But it's very likely that the T-rate was low because banks and other investors exploited the low FFR. Now that's gone, the system settled in a higher equilibrium (as foreign and other investors had no real reason to change their behavior).
NTDF9 8y ago
I'm not an economist but here's how I see it. Money flows into US treasury bonds, directly. People and corporations literally have direct accounts with the treasury. The US has large fiscal deficits and needs to borrow dollars. The FED set a good interest rate. It's causing owners of dollars to lend money to US Govt in hopes of safe interest gains. This large deficit happened because of large tax cuts in the first place. Which means, citizens have more dollars in their hands (at the expense of future interest payments). This is driving up spending and thus investment to satisfy that spending. The yield curve is flattening because of this as more and more people think that long term, the interest payments on today's spending will weigh on economy. Thus, it will ultimately cause FED to lower interest rates. Get in on risk free money while you can. All of the above is domestic US. Internationally, the dollars that could've helped other countries came back to US in the form of lending. So those countries don't have dollars to invest, causing drops in asset prices and deflation and debt overhang.
- WillPostForFood 8y ago
  * This large deficit happened because of large tax cuts in the first place.* Tax cuts can't directly cause deficits, only spending can. Spending money you don't have offsetting revenue for causes the deficit. Cutting taxes without cutting spending is a problem. Tax revenue is not down, even with the tax cuts, but spending is growing much more quickly.
  - NTDF9 8y ago
    >> Tax cuts can't directly cause deficits, only spending can. Spending money you don't have offsetting revenue for causes the deficit. Cutting taxes without cutting spending is a problem. Tax revenue is not down, even with the tax cuts, but spending is growing much more quickly. That's a political debate. Economically, an entity needs to have equal inflow and outflow of money to be balanced. The govt needs enough revenue to offset its expenses (a lot of which is interest on debt taken years before, military and entitlements.) If you think about it, generations before partied hard on the credit card with low taxes && still getting social security, medicare etc. Today's generation gets to pick either low taxes or social security/medicare. Tomorrow's generation might not even have the choice.

jazzyjackson 8y ago

I feel like the stats of how American companies are selling in China is not an indicator of the growth of the Chinese economy, of course the market and real estate indicators are still valid.

witcherchaos 8y ago
Louis Vuitton is a French company. Also, Burberry, am English company, had 8% drop in sales
- monocasa 8y ago
  Better said: it's not clear that foreign company crashes in China are a sign that the Chinese economy is "crumbling". One of the largest pieces of their current economic plan is "Made in China 2025": a shift from being a contract manufacturing base to instead be building and manufacturing Chinese designed and branded goods. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Made_in_China_2025 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Made_in_China_2025
  - witcherchaos 8y ago
    Incorrect 1.) made in 2025 was announced in 2015. Crash happened last year in a sudden fashion across all luxury goods 2.) brand loyalty doesn’t work like an immediate switch easily levered by a government. 3.) average Chinese citizens prefer foreign brands still, due to food and vaccine poisoning cases from local firms
    - coldtea 8y ago
      Incorrect >1.) made in 2025 was announced in 2015. Crash happened last year in a sudden fashion across all luxury goods Which is neither here nor there. Something can be announced in 2015 and be put in effect "last year", or have some significant component on it put in effect last year, or see the first major results of the overall thing a few years later. >2.) brand loyalty doesn’t work like an immediate switch easily levered by a government. Extra tariffs and support for local made products ("buy patriotic"), however does. >3.) average Chinese citizens prefer foreign brands still, due to food and vaccine poisoning cases from local firms Which is irrelevant to things that are not foods.