>that enables the freedom for the child to go outside whatsoever But this is not comparable to "going outside" at all. This is "seeking out and going onto priv

>that enables the freedom for the child to go outside whatsoever But this is not comparable to "going outside" at all. This is "seeking out and going onto private property and seeing stuff you shouldn't". The logic that a company is comparable to public spaces doesn't hold water. YouTube is not a public space any more than Pornhub or 4chan is. If 4chan wanted to cater to 10 year olds (yes yes I know) then the way to do so would clearly not be to remove content not suitable to kids but to create a separate place for those kids.