4 ms·
I'm curious about your reasoning for going with the Jag. Never had an issue with bluetooth on our Model S/X. The X with the tow package made it very utilitarian
by xedeon 8y ago
I'm curious about your reasoning for going with the Jag. Never had an issue with bluetooth on our Model S/X. The X with the tow package made it very utilitarian and practical. Not to mention the ease and convenience when it comes to child/baby seats.
Moreover, the I-PACE however is an engineering disaster. They did not develop the motor/inverter/aero enough and wastes power. They ended up needing a bigger battery to make the thing work, costing more yet giving horrible range... Even a Model X from 2016 is much more efficient.
Model X vs I-PACE vs Audi e-tron
Model X wins by far. @120km/h Tesla is 23% more efficient than the e-tron.
Model X - 24.8 kWh/100 km (39.9 kWh/100mi)
E-Tron - 30.5 kWh/100 km (49.1 kWh/100mi)
I-Pace - 31.3 kWh/100 km (50,37 kWh/100mi)
Source: https://nextmove.de/autobahn-test-tesla-model-x-beats-audi-e-tron-jaguar-i-pace/ https://nextmove.de/autobahn-test-tesla-model-x-beats-audi-e...
It's interesting to also note that the Tesla Model X is the largest of the 3, and still is more efficient.
- steelframe 8y agoI guess I don't care about the efficiency at all. The features I do care about are whether I have enough range to use it the way I need to and whether it accelerates fast. On both counts it does perfectly fine. I might pay a little more for amount of electricity I use, but that's not exactly the "high-order bit" in terms of the TCO of the vehicle.