3 ms·
My vlogger example was rather lazy. I'm not really sure how to define the current meta youtube content but "creative" is definitely not a word would be using fo
by kabacha 8y ago
My vlogger example was rather lazy. I'm not really sure how to define the current meta youtube content but "creative" is definitely not a word would be using for majority of it.
I mean every youtuber thinks about how to avoid being demotized or just in general reduced profits.
I think your point about public filming is very valid as well. Even if the risk that your video will get caught in the filter is <5% it's still not a risk worth taking.
I watch a lot of skating videos and un-surprisingly enough they feature kids, sometimes as main subjects but often in the background. Filming at skatepark is suddenly a considerable risk because a falling kid might evoke some sexual conotation in extreme minority.
This is a lazy solution that unfortunately just be adapted into the collosal folder of other lazy youtube solutions until this medium loses the last bits of creativity it had.