4 ms·
>Debate doesn't mean adversarial; it means questioning the evidence Questioning the evidence of climate change is de facto adversarial. The evidence is overwhe
by dontbenebby 8y ago
>Debate doesn't mean adversarial; it means questioning the evidence
Questioning the evidence of climate change is de facto adversarial. The evidence is overwhelming and beyond question. No intelligent, sane person arguing in good faith would argue otherwise.
- edmundsauto 8y agoYour derision and perspective are more appropriate for a religious zealot than a scientific thinker. Skepticism is the heart of science. I have not invested enough time in understanding the currently best climate models. I must, therefore, take a skeptical approach and question conclusions drawn from that evidence. Especially so for a projection. For the level of assurance you seem to have, I assume that you have rerun models yourself, have a deep understanding of complex systems and statistics, and done other climactic work? Even that is skepticism applied and questions asked.