4 ms·
> Some non state actors started the conflict, and India decided to make it an official conflict. State actors can't really treat these non-conventional forces a
by Bhilai 8y ago
> Some non state actors started the conflict, and India decided to make it an official conflict. State actors can't really treat these non-conventional forces as extensions of the military of other countries and retaliate against them.
Sorry but this is total BS. Pakistan as a state is known to support and sponsor terrorist groups including Jaish-e-Mohammed, which was responsible for the recent attack that led to deaths of 40 Indian soldiers. Jaish has terrorist camps in Pakistan occupied part of Kashmir. So even if what you claim is true, the Govt. of Pakistan has all the powers to put an end to these camps but they chose not to.
- devoply 8y agoGovernment of India and the Indian military similarly has the power to stop all of its abuses of Kashmir but chooses not to... Each side is playing its game. They are both wrong.
- xbmcuser 8y agoThe timing of the terrorist attack in India was at the worst time for Pakistan as the Saudi delegation was visiting at the time. And the attack was done by a kashmiri living in indian part of Kashmir that had been abused by Indian forces earlier. You can blame Pakistan but reality is it is India own behaviour in Kashmir that is causing the problems. Pakistan might have supported armed conflict in Indian Kashmir earlier but the current government and people in power are not interested in it. And by the way An Indian Navy guy (Indian claims retired) is in international Court being tried for terrorism in Pakistan. So it is not like India has not been doing the same in Pakistan province of Balouchistan