2 ms·
Yes. I agree. Some might even argue that this applies to Go itself: its builtin generics get you a lot without bringing in the full baggage of user-defined gene
by burntsushi 8y ago
Yes. I agree. Some might even argue that this applies to Go itself: its builtin generics get you a lot without bringing in the full baggage of user-defined generics.
There's really nothing in my comment that suggests I think otherwise, so I'm a bit confused by your comment.
- stcredzero 8y agoI'm expanding on your comment about trade-offs. I tend to like nuanced views of cost-benefit trade-offs in language design. It is a complicated subject, after all.