You can’t abstract away from the content to the pure form of an action, and then posit that there’s no observable difference between two (very much different) e

You can’t abstract away from the content to the pure form of an action, and then posit that there’s no observable difference between two (very much different) examples. Ex: „If banks stop allowing strangers to withdraw money from my account, how will I ever get my money“ And, no, questions of fact aren’t different. The earth is round, not flat. One tree does not a forest make, but a thousand does. Even if we can’t agree on the specific cutoff (is 15 trees a forest? 50? 500?), that does not prevent us from accurately describing the extremes.