In fairness, I tend to see two types of responses: One of the kind you mention - “the article actually says ...”, in which the respondent goes to the effort of

In fairness, I tend to see two types of responses: One of the kind you mention - “the article actually says ...”, in which the respondent goes to the effort of basically summarizing the article OP didn’t bother to read. Those generally catch moderate upvotes. Then there’s the more blunt variety, along the lines of RTFM. Those catch solid downvotes. Frankly, I’d rather neither existed, and posts that clearly didn’t bother looking at anything but the headline were just flagged and deleted.