4 ms·
you're right but how would you define violent and hateful content? it's not easy. ok, somebody could build a neural network and train it with typical violent co
by pa7 16y ago
you're right but how would you define violent and hateful content? it's not easy. ok, somebody could build a neural network and train it with typical violent content, but violence has too many types
- netcan 16y agoDo you think there is any other type of potentially offensive content that could be filtered in this way?
- nailer 16y ago> you're right but how would you define violent and hateful content? For one subset of violence, gore pictures, you could identify body parts (already solved) then look for what appears to be wounds using color changes and edges. That's of course one small part of the concept of violence - you're totally correct in stating this is difficult. Also hateful is more objective/political so I don't think we have much chance there.
- burgerbrain 16y agoHow do you define pornographic content? It's not easy, and this thing doesn't even do it well or cleverly. It just looks for large amounts of flesh. We've had systems that do this since the 90s. This doesn't seem to solve any of the flaws that were present in those older systems, it's only news because somebody coded it up in a popular language. I would wager it would be rather easy to make a system that detects bloody gore at a higher accuracy rate than this crap. Of course I have little interest in aiding any sort of censorship, so you won't see me attempting it.