3 ms·
If this were true then why have upper limits at all? The only reason I can think of is to protect large corporations.
by Mirioron 8y ago
If this were true then why have upper limits at all? The only reason I can think of is to protect large corporations.
- munchbunny 8y agoFor two reasons: 1. To prevent cruel and unusual punishment. 2. To set expectations about the seriousness of the infraction in the eyes of the law. I am not a lawyer or a legal scholar, so I'm sure there are more reasons.
- dragonwriter 8y ago> If this were true then why have upper limits at all? Because while the rulemaker believes that there is a range of potentially reasonable judgments based on particular circumstances, they do not believe that range is unbounded. > The only reason I can think of is to protect large corporations. The fixed minimum upper limit of $20 million is actually probably to prevent (or limit the effect of) large corporations using smaller subsidiaries and fancy accounting for GDPR-risky activities, rather than the upper limit protecting large corps.