5 ms·

I don't like how people have a fixed capacity for discontent. Everything is so amazing and yet people get really upset over the smallest things but are not will

by sisu2019 8y ago

I don't like how people have a fixed capacity for discontent. Everything is so amazing and yet people get really upset over the smallest things but are not willing to do anything to mitigate the effects they don't like. Okay it's too much to ask to just apply updates when they come. It's too much to ask to set a time when these reboots could happen. It's too much to ask to just press CTRL+S every once in a while. I wonder what will be too much to ask next ... Btw it's not hard to see that MS is working on making windows better even if it's hit and miss at the moment. Forcing reboots /is/ exactly that progress when it comes to windows security and I think it's quite unfair to not acknowledge the history that led to this.

etaioinshrdlu 8y ago
Some people have different work habits. Some people do critical work that can't be delayed. This OS behavior wouldn't be acceptable in a computer running in a surgery office or a nuclear control room. The problem is the OS is limiting its acceptable use cases to where the work isn't terribly important and can be interrupted without warning. This is a technology problem with a technological solution. These users would be wise to choose an OS that won't fail this way.
- sisu2019 8y ago
  well of course everyone knows that all the smart uninterruptible rocket surgeons use linux nudge wink. It's okay to not target every possible group under the sun. And to be honest windows is getting a bit too dumbed down even for me And that's what stings, I guess. For all the things they do wrong, they get the most shit for one of the few things they got right. Everyman user will delay updates forever so they must be forced to apply them.
- derefr 8y ago
  Microsoft wouldn’t sell a surgery office or nuclear bunker the versions of Windows with automatic updates in. Even if they tried, the relevant organizations wouldn’t buy those versions. Even if they did, regulators wouldn’t allow the purchase. It’s like complaining that your game console can’t run hard-real-time factory control software. Nobody ever claimed it did, and you’d be personally irresponsible to even try. There are certifications hardware and software need to achieve to be used for such purposes. Use the certified software. (Windows Embedded Core, for example.)
  - newen 8y ago
    Well some people consider their work to be as important as rocket brains surgery. I'm serious. I don't want to maintain my OS. I don't want to be interrupted by it. I want it to just work and work without any issues. Right now, I just disable all updates and hope nothing bad happens. I tried the rolling updates thing but it was both extremely annoying and it screwed up my settings. Sure security bad blah blah but I don't really care, I just want my work done.
  - etaioinshrdlu 8y ago
    Maybe this points out the real problem... There's no way to buy Windows minus the unsafe crap, and still use it for regular work. It's what the "pro" version should be, but isn't.

etaioinshrdlu 8y ago

Some people have different work habits. Some people do critical work that can't be delayed. This OS behavior wouldn't be acceptable in a computer running in a surgery office or a nuclear control room. The problem is the OS is limiting its acceptable use cases to where the work isn't terribly important and can be interrupted without warning. This is a technology problem with a technological solution. These users would be wise to choose an OS that won't fail this way.

sisu2019 8y ago
well of course everyone knows that all the smart uninterruptible rocket surgeons use linux nudge wink. It's okay to not target every possible group under the sun. And to be honest windows is getting a bit too dumbed down even for me And that's what stings, I guess. For all the things they do wrong, they get the most shit for one of the few things they got right. Everyman user will delay updates forever so they must be forced to apply them.
derefr 8y ago
Microsoft wouldn’t sell a surgery office or nuclear bunker the versions of Windows with automatic updates in. Even if they tried, the relevant organizations wouldn’t buy those versions. Even if they did, regulators wouldn’t allow the purchase. It’s like complaining that your game console can’t run hard-real-time factory control software. Nobody ever claimed it did, and you’d be personally irresponsible to even try. There are certifications hardware and software need to achieve to be used for such purposes. Use the certified software. (Windows Embedded Core, for example.)
- newen 8y ago
  Well some people consider their work to be as important as rocket brains surgery. I'm serious. I don't want to maintain my OS. I don't want to be interrupted by it. I want it to just work and work without any issues. Right now, I just disable all updates and hope nothing bad happens. I tried the rolling updates thing but it was both extremely annoying and it screwed up my settings. Sure security bad blah blah but I don't really care, I just want my work done.
- etaioinshrdlu 8y ago
  Maybe this points out the real problem... There's no way to buy Windows minus the unsafe crap, and still use it for regular work. It's what the "pro" version should be, but isn't.