That worker exploit doesn't make any sense, as written: > Technically, Service Workers are an update to an older API called Web Workers. However, unlike web wo

That worker exploit doesn't make any sense, as written: > Technically, Service Workers are an update to an older API called Web Workers. However, unlike web workers, a service worker, once registered and activated, can live and run in the page's background, without requiring the user to continue browsing through the site that loaded the service worker. This isn't true. A service worker will be automatically shut down when it isn't attached to a browsing context. Not immediately, but it definitely doesn't support what the article describes.