I don't buy it. It's one jump to method definition away, which even an editor without IDE capability should be able to manage. But also, this is what dynamic la

I don't buy it. It's one jump to method definition away, which even an editor without IDE capability should be able to manage. But also, this is what dynamic languages look like, and people still manage to be productive. (I'll agree it can be a bit tricky with LINQ and anonymous types in C#, but I think `var` usage is worth that trade-off)