6 ms·
This thread consists of conservatives whining about CNN and others, vs others taking shots at the post and the author of the article. So yeah, bias. I'm not at
by anth_anm 8y ago
This thread consists of conservatives whining about CNN and others, vs others taking shots at the post and the author of the article.
So yeah, bias. I'm not at all convinced this is a "both sides" issue. You can find errors in coverage and examples of bias, but the scale of the Murdoch/Mercer news empires really has no match from the center. The actual left wing is pretty well unrepresented.
The big problem I have is their obsession with ridiculous fact checking now. Not checking how many bodies are actually in the morgue, or whether or not a statue was removed. I mean the bullshit pedantry. Donald Trump says in the state of the union that the US has been at war in the middle east for almost 19 years. The NYT "fact checks" that as "actually it's only been almost 18 years". What does that accomplish? Is anyone more informed? Is there any story there? Is there any commentary on the state of the union, or just a summary? Does it matter at all? Is their fact check even accurate?
My problem with it is that this has replaced any sort of quality journalism with just a mass of worthless fact checks and the important stuff gets buried.
- timw4mail 8y agoThere's huge bias on both sides, especially to the extremes. There are very few moderate left or moderate right news outlets, perhaps because moderate news isn't as prone to the virality of the far left/far right viewpoints. "Fact checking" largely seems to be an attempt at appeasement to the error-rate of instant news.