4 ms·
Will this technology slowly replace external crystals for generic microcontrollers? Or just for high-accuracy applications.
by bgorman 8y ago
Will this technology slowly replace external crystals for generic microcontrollers? Or just for high-accuracy applications.
- zeroping 8y agoFor many low-accuracy applications, just an RC oscillator is used. This sounds like a good way to reduce part count for systems that need the accuracy of a crystal - if the main IC is made by TI.
- PaulHoule 8y agoOr somebody that licenses the patent(s) from TI.
- dbcurtis 8y agoIf it is as good as the article claims, I would say more like “instantly”. Bringing the resonator on die eliminates the crystal from the BOM, one of the pricier passive components. Also probably two capacitors are now gone, again for xtal circuits you need better caps, cheapies are not good for oscillator circuits. Plus the PCB area for the oscillator is eliminated, and that is an area of PCB that requires careful layout to meet the constraints on paracitic capacitance, etc.
- baybal2 8y agoProcess people will take their sweet time to turn this into a marketable fab product. I'd say that it can come to market quicker as a packaging house product: they grow resonator dies with BAW separately, dice them, and put into existing RF SoC packages.
- janekm 8y agoOf course currently only TI can make these (though no doubt everyone else is going to make a real effort to replicate). The chip in question is rather pricey though, $11.44 in thousand quantities vs. $3.54 for the very similar NRF52840 + about $1 for the crystal and other components needed.
- TrueDuality 8y agoThe increase in power draw is significant for a lot of applications which will make these unfeasible. That being said there are a lot more applications that could fit that within their power budget. I suspect in the cases where the power isn't an issue it will come down to the designers choosing between the cost and space trade off where a crystal is necessary (it isn't always).