5 ms·
>But of the potential superpowers, there is only one that respects freedom and democracy, and there is only one that doesn't wage wars of aggression to expand t
by otalp 8y ago
>But of the potential superpowers, there is only one that respects freedom and democracy, and there is only one that doesn't wage wars of aggression to expand their borders.
- The US has military bases in over a hundred countries in the world,
- has a long and storied history of supporting US-friendly dictators over "chaotic" democracies,
- has for over 60 years tried to control Latin America by overthrowing democratically elected governments(when Chile democratically elected a person who would protect their copper mines, Henry Kissinger - Hillary Clinton's mentor called the rise of independent democracies shunning US influence "a "virus" that would "infect" the region with effects all the way to Italy."),
- funding military coups and destabilising governments across the world,
- intervening in elections through massive financial support(including the Russian election the 90s, ironically)
- supporting apartheid South Africa and the Israeli occupation of Gaza
Imagine if China had military bases in Puerto Rico or Canada. Or if Russia was carrying out an invasion of Brazil to overthrow the US backed Bolsonaro Government in order to stop him destroying the Amazon and vastly accelerating climate change.
Take the current commander in chief of the US army, who asked why the US hasn't invaded Venezuela yet with all their oil. Who gives billions to the major funders of islamic terrorism - Saudi Arabia, and also gives them chemical weapons(White Phosphorous) to use on Yemeni civilians.
If the US is to be truly exceptional, it could start by following international law.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]