3 ms·
We don’t call them taxis in California because in most California cities they’re different because of: * no access to red lanes * only app-based payment * un
by scarejunba 8y ago
We don’t call them taxis in California because in most California cities they’re different because of:
* no access to red lanes
* only app-based payment
* unique pickup/dropoff locations at airports and other such places
If we called them computer-dispatched taxi we’d confuse that with Flywheel-style stuff which can use red lanes, take cash, and use taxi locations. We could call them Taxi Type 2 but that’s super confusing.
“TNCs” is just an awful name so we use something that sounds intuitive “ridesharing”, since we know that pooling is possible on these services. It’s just a name. No one has proposed an alternative simple enough.
- johnday 8y agoIn Transport for London terminology they are called "Private Hire" companies. Separately regulated, you can't flag them down on the street, and no access to taxi lanes.
- mattmanser 8y agoIn the UK we've had this semantic split for decades and it's simply "private hire" vs "taxi".