This article is plain pageview fodder. It begins by repeating known facts about the talent war between Facebook and Google, and then dives off about a "lack of

This article is plain pageview fodder. It begins by repeating known facts about the talent war between Facebook and Google, and then dives off about a "lack of social" at high levels without even attempting any connecting statements. Yes, Facebook's focus is "social", but it'll take more than an utterly unsubstantiated almost-quote like "younger employees, especially, say they are turned off by their bosses’ lack of social media savviness on a personal level" to convince anyone of even a base correlation. I really don't think anyone presently working at Google is judging their bosses by their volume of tweets - and if they are, hiring them may well (imo) have been an error.