3 ms·
> since there are no viable alternatives to driving in LA, either rideshare or private car. The article seems to imply otherwise, that tons of money has been s
by sbarre 8y ago
> since there are no viable alternatives to driving in LA, either rideshare or private car.
The article seems to imply otherwise, that tons of money has been spent on improving public transit.
Not agreeing with you or the article either way, just pointing that out.
- longerthoughts 8y agoSeems like the article is going out of its way to make public transit sound attractive with phrasing like "Metro’s sprawling bus network". Anecdotally, nobody I know in LA considers public transit as a realistic option and they routinely make jokes about how bad it is.
- deaddodo 8y agoLA Public Transit is fine if you have a very specific set of routes (WeHo/Hollywood<->SFV, Pasadena<->SFV, Most anywhere<->downtown, etc); but it's terrible for one off/ad hoc routes or uncommon commutes.
- gamblor956 8y agoAnecdotally, everyone I know considers LA mass transit to be a viable option. This ranges from professionals like doctors and lawyers to the homeless. I know a number of transplants from NYC, Chicago, and DC who ditched their cars after they moved to LA because it's possible to get everywhere worth going by Metro.