It's pretty absurd to ignore broad scientific consensus (which includes a pretty large number of Harvard immunology PhDs) while buying into the lies of a single

It's pretty absurd to ignore broad scientific consensus (which includes a pretty large number of Harvard immunology PhDs) while buying into the lies of a single authority who happens to argue what you like to hear. Cherrypicking one discredited scientist out of a million who backs up your beliefs is very clearly "anti-science". Just to address the actual article, which is filled with demonstrable lies, see the "What else does Tetyana Obukhanych say?" section here: https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/appeal-to-false-authority-who-is-tetyana-obukhanych/ https://www.skepticalraptor.com/skepticalraptorblog.php/appe...