3 ms·
>s that 'material information to investors'"? The guy went onto national television, implied he would not follow the court order, said he does not respect the
by tempworker9000 8y ago
>s that 'material information to investors'"?
The guy went onto national television, implied he would not follow the court order, said he does not respect the SEC, then went ahead and broke the order. How is this even debatable?
And let's not pretend that Tesla isn't already under scrutiny for absurd forecasts (under the guise of uncertainty) that they do not reach.