4 ms·
What kind of analysis is this? "I'd normally include a range of benchmarks for the board but I had so much trouble running them on the Orange Pi 3, only a few
by crististm 8y ago
What kind of analysis is this?
"I'd normally include a range of benchmarks for the board but I had so much trouble running them on the Orange Pi 3, only a few are worth reporting."
Then it goes on:
"Pi 3 recorded an average connection speed of 45.7Mbps via iPerf, a perfectly reasonable result and comparable with the Raspberry Pi 3 boards and the Rock Pi 4. It also racked up a score of 22 on the GLmark 2 GPU benchmark, slightly above a reported score of 18 for the Raspberry Pi 3 Model B on Ubuntu 16.04."
They'd better let numbers speak instead of letting emotional writing confirm a weak hardware review.
- peeters 8y agoIt wasn't a hardware review though, it was a platform review. If the platform has so many issues that you can't even test the hardware in an apples-to-apples comparison, that's worth mentioning in a review.
- crististm 8y agoWhat I understand is that they can write whatever they want and wave their hand when it comes to benchmarks? By the way, what part of the cited comparison where the "platforms" as you want to call them, compare on equal foot let them off the hook for a professional benchmarking in other areas?