Agreed. It would be nice if the author first explained what they meant by economics being "morally neutral" or "racially neutral" before declaring them falsehoo

Agreed. It would be nice if the author first explained what they meant by economics being "morally neutral" or "racially neutral" before declaring them falsehoods. For about half of these I can follow along with what the author's saying is false (though still, there's no justitication...). But the rest seem very weaselly or subjective.