4 ms·
>But then if we simplified the law to make it comprehensible to mortals again, who would need any algorithms at all? Because automating simple systems is what
by hueving 8y ago
>But then if we simplified the law to make it comprehensible to mortals again, who would need any algorithms at all?
Because automating simple systems is what software is great at. Why wouldn't you?
- dsfyu404ed 8y agoBecause it is likely to enable us to go further us down the path to 1984. Fucking with people's lives is something that should be done by a human that can see the bigger picture, not a bunch of code daisy chained together.
- polyterative 8y agoEven if humans are more wrong than the machines? Do we care more about justice or our humanity?
- lamy2000 8y agoThe argument for is that judges fuck with people's lives and judges are already unreliable. A simple ML system may have errors but could have less error than a judge. And there is evidence to that effect. https://www.nber.org/papers/w23180 https://www.nber.org/papers/w23180
- maxxxxx 8y agoThe machine will probably be very predictable so expect people working around it soon.