Wow, you are hilarious. Perhaps i should not have engaged with your original troll. I just thought it funny that it included the most misguided of arguments.

Wow, you are hilarious. Perhaps i should not have engaged with your original troll. I just thought it funny that it included the most misguided of arguments. There surely are plenty of other, real arguments you could have used (which might have been an interesting conversation), or even plenty of valid criticisms of the paper that did not involve: 1.scare quotes ("ideas") 2.questioning the basis of academic enquiry (no, a cite does not take on an oeuvre) 3.questioning the basis of language (words do actually contain specific meanings) 4.just restating the problem. I guess instead of admitting your original post was without merit, or even doubling down and proving me wrong, you just abdicated, in the most withering way (and then doubled down on your abdication.. pathetic).