3 ms·
One important thing here is that language is not equal to cognition. It is entirely possible to posess a high order intelligence but learn a concept of language
by wetpaws 8y ago
One important thing here is that language is not equal to cognition. It is entirely possible to posess a high order intelligence but learn a concept of language in later years (eg deaf people who learn sign language in 20s). So no, humans are not Markov chains, they are something stranger.
- mschrage 8y agoOliver Sack's excellent book "Seeing Voices" seems to argue something slightly different: "A human being is not mindless or mentally deficient without language, but he is severely restricted in the range of his ideas." To defend the original metaphor: without language, a person might be akin to a Markov chain generated from the relatively small 'corpus' of individual experience. While the 'well socialized' individual can draw on the vast range of human experiences shared in language. They have access to a much larger corpus.
- Firadeoclus 8y agoThey may have access to a much larger corpus, but isn't what they actually hear and read also limited to the relatively small corpus of individual experience? I don't want to underplay the density of ideas in language, but I think it's a common mistake to underestimate communication outside of language.
- robbiep 8y agoCommunication outside of (spoken) language is still a form of language
- Firadeoclus 8y agoThat would be one meaning of the word language. It isn't always used that way.