3 ms·

NYT's anti-India bias is showing. That said, this was expected. India's diplomacy and restraint has been tested time and time again. It has taken a page from I

NYT's anti-India bias is showing. That said, this was expected. India's diplomacy and restraint has been tested time and time again. It has taken a page from Israel, US & Russia's book. India is only cleaning up the mess that Pakistan should've cleared on its side of the border.

vkou 8y ago
I know nothing about the situation, so what you say may well be true, despite the assurances of Pakistan to the contrary. However, it may also well be false, despite the assurances of India to the contrary. I do know that if this escalates into a 'real' war, or, heaven forbid, a nuclear exchange, between the two countries, then the question of whether or not this attack was justified will be completely irrelevant.
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
- godelmachine 8y ago
  We Indian's are fed up of Pakistan's nuclear deterrence. Paki's don't let us live in peace, they harbor the most dangerous of terrorists (Don't forget Osama bin Laden so soon), and they don't wanna give up the thought of terrorizing India. It's high time these air strikes were conducted. They had it coming. We made sure no civilians were killed. Only those terrorists.
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
DSingularity 8y ago
And you are proud of this? Shame.
- l1feh4ck 8y ago
  I am very proud of this. And there is nothing to be ashamed of. India did not attack any civilians or military base, It attacked terrorist training camps. The attack was on an area 50Km after LOC(line of control) which is a part of Kashmir currently occupied by Pakistan. On Feb 14th 44 Indian reserve police were killed in a bomb attack made by the same pakisthan based Jihadi terroriest organisation Jaish-e-Mohammed. I think this is a major action against terror from India.
- godelmachine 8y ago
  You don't speak when you know nothing. Before being techie's or engineer's, we are Indian's first, and we are very proud of these air strikes. Paki's don't let us live in peace and it's high time the terrorists they harbored were blown off to pieces. Those cowards wage proxy war against us. Would you call US a coward for raiding bin Laden's camp in Abbottabad and bringing him down? Would you condemn Israel when they target Hamas militants? Shame and disgrace on you, sir! You have indirectly justified terrorism and Pakistan's cowardice.
debt 8y ago
It’s against international law to randomly bomb another country. Duh India didn’t get authorization from the UN Security Council nor was this in self defense. I think your bias may be showing.
- yumraj 8y ago
  Please see my comment below: this was in response to a terrorist attack in India about 2 weeks ago, which had killed 40+ people, by Pakistani terrorists. Moreover this targeted terrorist camps in remote areas, and not Pakistani military or civilian targets.
- deleted 8y ago
  [deleted]
- thewhitetulip 8y ago
  It is against common sense and international law to harbour known terrorists on your soil. Yet Pakistan has repeatedly provided a safehouse. Till now, US & Pak interests were aligned so US acted as broker, meaning Pak based terrorists went Scott free. For the first time in history a US president has dropped the usual advice of restraint. Of course, I'm not saying India should bomb Karachi, that's against common sense. Because civilians are killed in such a strike. But targeting a terror camp on a mountain is justified after you know that 50+ Army men were maryted in a bomb vehicle attack 12days ago. And that terror attack was carried out by JeM
- Arnt 8y ago
  FWIW, that part of Kashmir isn't technically another country. Kashmir's unelected ruler chose to remain independent when he had to choose back in August 1947, Pakistan invaded in September and Kashmir then joined India in October. The border is labelled "line of control" on the maps. What India bombed is in the part of Kashmir-then-India that Pakistan effectively controls but that other countries don't recognise.
  - manojlds 8y ago
    BTW, it wasn't PoK that was attacked. It was Pakistan.

vkou 8y ago

I know nothing about the situation, so what you say may well be true, despite the assurances of Pakistan to the contrary. However, it may also well be false, despite the assurances of India to the contrary. I do know that if this escalates into a 'real' war, or, heaven forbid, a nuclear exchange, between the two countries, then the question of whether or not this attack was justified will be completely irrelevant.

deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
godelmachine 8y ago
We Indian's are fed up of Pakistan's nuclear deterrence. Paki's don't let us live in peace, they harbor the most dangerous of terrorists (Don't forget Osama bin Laden so soon), and they don't wanna give up the thought of terrorizing India. It's high time these air strikes were conducted. They had it coming. We made sure no civilians were killed. Only those terrorists.

deleted 8y ago

[deleted]

DSingularity 8y ago

And you are proud of this? Shame.

l1feh4ck 8y ago
I am very proud of this. And there is nothing to be ashamed of. India did not attack any civilians or military base, It attacked terrorist training camps. The attack was on an area 50Km after LOC(line of control) which is a part of Kashmir currently occupied by Pakistan. On Feb 14th 44 Indian reserve police were killed in a bomb attack made by the same pakisthan based Jihadi terroriest organisation Jaish-e-Mohammed. I think this is a major action against terror from India.
godelmachine 8y ago
You don't speak when you know nothing. Before being techie's or engineer's, we are Indian's first, and we are very proud of these air strikes. Paki's don't let us live in peace and it's high time the terrorists they harbored were blown off to pieces. Those cowards wage proxy war against us. Would you call US a coward for raiding bin Laden's camp in Abbottabad and bringing him down? Would you condemn Israel when they target Hamas militants? Shame and disgrace on you, sir! You have indirectly justified terrorism and Pakistan's cowardice.

debt 8y ago

It’s against international law to randomly bomb another country. Duh India didn’t get authorization from the UN Security Council nor was this in self defense. I think your bias may be showing.

yumraj 8y ago
Please see my comment below: this was in response to a terrorist attack in India about 2 weeks ago, which had killed 40+ people, by Pakistani terrorists. Moreover this targeted terrorist camps in remote areas, and not Pakistani military or civilian targets.
deleted 8y ago
[deleted]
thewhitetulip 8y ago
It is against common sense and international law to harbour known terrorists on your soil. Yet Pakistan has repeatedly provided a safehouse. Till now, US & Pak interests were aligned so US acted as broker, meaning Pak based terrorists went Scott free. For the first time in history a US president has dropped the usual advice of restraint. Of course, I'm not saying India should bomb Karachi, that's against common sense. Because civilians are killed in such a strike. But targeting a terror camp on a mountain is justified after you know that 50+ Army men were maryted in a bomb vehicle attack 12days ago. And that terror attack was carried out by JeM
Arnt 8y ago
FWIW, that part of Kashmir isn't technically another country. Kashmir's unelected ruler chose to remain independent when he had to choose back in August 1947, Pakistan invaded in September and Kashmir then joined India in October. The border is labelled "line of control" on the maps. What India bombed is in the part of Kashmir-then-India that Pakistan effectively controls but that other countries don't recognise.
- manojlds 8y ago
  BTW, it wasn't PoK that was attacked. It was Pakistan.