3 ms·
4-7 of these aren't so much "myths" are "ideas that one or two recent papers has cast some doubt upon." Not to say that these won't turn out to be more thorough
by gok 8y ago
4-7 of these aren't so much "myths" are "ideas that one or two recent papers has cast some doubt upon." Not to say that these won't turn out to be more thoroughly debunked in the future, but it hasn't happened yet.
Browsing through papers from a few years ago some of these myths in 2011 might have been:
1. You need to pre-train large networks so that they converge
2. You need GPUs to train deep networks efficiently
#1 did indeed turn out to be false; pre-training has pretty convincingly been debunked. But if anything #2 turned out very right; there's no serious training happening today on CPUs.
A bit of conjecture here but I suspect word embeddings are going to turn to be the next big thing that turns out not to be all that useful.
- screye 8y agoHas #1 really been proven to be false ? Transfer learning using the first few layers pertained on imagenet or a related task have consistently given 1-2% improvements in scores... As recently as mid 2018. This is especially for complex tasks like VQA
- gok 8y agoTransfer learning (or student-teacher training) isn't really the same thing as pre-training as it was being talked about 10 years ago. And in those days the claim wasn't that it helped a bit, but that it made training many deeper networks possible at all.