3 ms·
No, the intent is that he doesn't take the secs censure seriously. It helps to address the question of if this was an honest mistake or not, and the judgement w
by joshuamorton 8y ago
No, the intent is that he doesn't take the secs censure seriously. It helps to address the question of if this was an honest mistake or not, and the judgement will likely take that into account.
- jacques_chester 8y agoThe SEC are arguing that civil contempt doesn't require intent. But they also point out that yeah, maybe he's doing it on purpose.